Wednesday, December 3, 2014

#35. Israel — Prince of God (Genesis xxxii.).

     Jacob’s first meeting with the God of his fathers at Bethel and the impress of grace he there received is to have yet more and abiding fruit.  In a night vision some twenty years afterwards the Lord again speaks to him saying:--

     “I am the God of Bethel … now arise, get thee out of this land and return unto the land of thy kindred” (Gen. xxxi. 13).

     We have no means of determining whether Jacob’s silent flight was dictated by natural cunning or by Divine instruction, nor are we called upon to pass judgment.  The action itself could be right or wrong, according to the will of the Lord at the time.  Laban however gives chase, but before he can come up with the fugitives God came to Laban the Syrian in a dream by night saying, “Take heed that thou speak not to Jacob either good or bad”.  Laban’s search for his stolen gods proves fruitless, and Jacob, knowing nothing of Rachel’s action, takes the opportunity of forcing upon the conscience of Laban his own dishonest dealings during the time when Jacob served him faithfully and well (Genesis.xxxi.37-42).  Laban and Jacob build a “witness heap” and a “watch tower”, for Laban said, “the Lord watch between me and thee when we are absent one from another”.

     At the close of the solemn covenanting Laban departed and “Jacob went on his way, and the angel of God met him”.  Upon hearing of the approach of Esau with a company of four hundred men Jacob does two things:  he first disposed of his forces, with foresight and wisdom taking the “two bands” of angels as his guide, and secondly he prayed.  Here is the first real prayer recorded in the Bible.  Abraham’s intercession for Sodom is more like an argument.  Abraham’s servant’s words in  Genesis xxiv.  are the expression of a desire for a sign.  Here is a real prayer.  It commences and ends with a reference to the covenant.  Jacob’s conception of his claim on God is not based upon his worthiness or his need, but upon the covenant made with his fathers.  The reference to the covenant made unto the fathers is followed by a remembrance of a personal promise, which in its turn is echoed by a confessed fear and felt need;  in the center comes the repudiation of all worthiness echoed by an acknowledgment of God’s faithfulness:--


A   |   xxxii. 9-.   The God of the covenant with Abraham and Isaac.
     B   |   -9.   Reminder of promise.
          C   |   10-.   Confession of utter unworthiness.
          C   |   -10.   Acknowledgment of overflowing blessing.
     B   |   11-.   Prayer for deliverance.
A   |   -11.   Reference to covenant blessing.

     Jacob after this prayer arranges a present to pass over the ford that Esau may be appeased and accept his returning brother in peace.  His two wives and his two women servants together with his eleven sons pass over the ford, “and Jacob was left alone”.  If Jacob could say of Bethel “how dreadful is this place”, what shall he say of this all-night wrestling with the angel of God?  “And there wrestled a Man with him.”  This wrestler is called God in verse 30.

     There is a division of opinion regarding the meaning of this midnight wrestling.  Some see in it a picture of overcoming prayer — but it does not say Jacob wrestled, but the Man wrestled — Jacob’s attitude was one of resistance.  This passage, coupled with the strange supplanting act at his birth, is referred to in  Hosea xii.,  and possibly the reference there will aid us in understanding the purport of  Genesis xxxii.   The passage in the A.V. reads as follows:--

     “He took his brother by the heel in the womb, and by strength he had power with God (margin ‘was a prince, or behaved himself princely’), yea, he had power over the angel, and prevailed, he wept and made supplication unto him, he found him in Bethel, and there he spake with us, even the Lord God of hosts;  the Lord is his memorial.”

     The Companion Bible differs from the majority of commentators, both in the passage in  Genesis.xxxii.  and in  Hosea xii.   In  Genesis xxxii.  the changed name Israel is interpreted, “God commands, orders or rules”, and the additional remark is made that “out of some forty Hebrew names compounded with El or Jah God is always the doer of what the verb means (cf. Dan-el, God judges).  “The name” (continues the note) “is used here not to dignify but to reproach”, and the references are given.  The words “hast thou power with God and with men and hast prevailed” are explained to mean that Jacob had contended with Esau at birth, for the birthright, for the blessing, and with Laban.  In contending with men he had succeeded, but now contending with God he fails, and receives the name Isra-el, (God commands) to teach him the greatly needed lesson of dependence upon God.

     The notes of the Companion Bible to  Hosea xii. 4, 5  are even more complicated.  The words “by his strength” (in his manhood) referring to another occasion of strife;  “had power with” (contended with), Heb. Sarah (hence his name Israel).  The word “prevailed” is not to be referred to the result of Jacob’s contending, but means that He (the angel) prevailed.  “He found him in Bethel”, i.e., God found Jacob.  If Jacob’s new name Israel indicates “God commands” it cannot at the same time have any connection with Jacob’s own “contending” — see note above — it must be one or the other, yet the Companion Bible emphasizes both.

     We cannot say that the note on  Genesis xxxii.  appeals to us as being the true meaning, and therefore we have no help for it but an independent search into what is confessedly a difficult passage.  One interpretation makes Israel a Prince with God, because he had power with God and prevailed, the other makes the name Israel mean God commands, and supposes it used as a reproach not a dignity.  Let us turn again to  Gen. xxxii. 24, 25.  “WRESTLED.” — This word occurs nowhere else in the O.T.  A substantive derived from this word is translated five times “dust” and twice “powder”.  This would show the idea to be more  “pounding”,  “crushing”,  or  “pulverizing”  than  “wrestling”.  It does not seem possible that an ordinary man could in his own strength “wrestle” with the Angel of God for hours, but from what we have gathered of Jacob’s character we can understand that it was not a trifling thing to reduce his old nature to powder.

     “PREVAIL.” — This word suits well the idea of wrestling, but when connected with reducing anything to powder it is not so fitting;  it is translated “could” in  Genesis xiii. 6,  xxxvi. 7,  xxxvii. 4,  xlv. 1, 3;  “can” in  Gen. xiii. 16,  xix. 19, 22,  xxiv. 50,  xxix. 8,  xxxi. 35,  and as this is the usual rendering we are under no necessity to translate the passage other than “was not able”, or “could not”.  One suggestive use of the word is found in  II Sam. xvii. 20,  “they be gone over the brook of water”.   In  II Sam. xvii. 20  we have mee-chal, when joined with the word for water it means, “manageable water”, “fordable water”, “water that can be overcome”.  Jacob, by the ford Jabbok, was not so manageable.  As the dawn of day approached it became imperative that the reduction of Jacob should be accomplished, and the angel touched the hollow of Jacob’s thigh, and he limped the remainder of his pilgrimage.  Jacob now clings tight to the angel and says, “I will not let thee go, except thou bless me”.

     Now, do the words that follow indicate a blessing for Jacob, or otherwise?  First of all his name is changed, “Thy name shall be called no more Jacob but Israel”.  Now if Israel be a term of reproach, we are faced with a problem indeed;  we are further told that Jacob had succeeded in his contending with men, but had failed with God.  Neither statement is true, Jacob miserably failed in the scheme to get the blessing and Scripture settles the other statement by saying of Jacob, “as a prince hast thou power with GOD and with men, and hast prevailed”.

     We have other evidences of the purport of a change of name in Genesis, e.g., Abraham instead of Abram, Sarah instead of Sarai.  In both cases the change is to a higher plane and the result of a blessing.  The name Sarah means Princess and contains the word which gives us I-sra-el.   SAR. — Sar is rendered “prince” 208 times, and “captain” 125 times, hence chief, ruler, governor, etc., and seen in connection with Sarah Jacob’s new name seems to echo its meaning, she the Princess, he the Prince.  One feature of great importance must now be noted which links together the changed names of Abraham, Sarah, and Israel, and also substantiates the meaning of Prince in the name Israel.

     “As for Sarai thy wife, thou shall not call her name Sarai, but Sarah shall be her name … KINGS of people shall be of her” (Gen. xvii. 15, 16).

     “Thy name shall not be called any more Jacob, but Israel … KINGS shall come out of thy loins” (Gen. xxxv. 10).

     We must by this evidence retain the kingly thought in the word Israel.  Here, in each instance, the change of name is associated with blessing, and a promise of a royal seed.  Newburry interprets Isra-El by a prince of God, just as we translate Peni-El, face of God, or Beth-El, house of God.  The change of name was given for a revealed reason, “FOR thou wast as a prince”, saritha, “as a prince hast thou power”, being but one word.

     This word occurs nowhere else, but in  Hosea x. 11.   Bethel in the days of Hosea had become notorious for its idolatry.  Israel is exhorted to consider the typical history of their father Israel, how from being a supplanter he was changed to a Prince of God, and how from being a keeper of sheep (xii.12) he became a Prince of God, or, as the parallel is written turning from the type to the antitype, the captive bondman Israel in Egypt brought out of Egypt by a prophet (xii. 13) to become when at last they see God face to face “kings and priests unto God”.  Ephraim or Israel had become idolators, they had fallen by their iniquity, yet, saith the Lord, “I will heal their backsliding, I will love them freely”.  Jacob’s experience at Jabbok is an O.T. parallel to Paul’s experience spoken of in  II Cor.  xii. 9, 10:--

     “And He said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee:  for My strength is made perfect in weakness.  Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmity that the power of Christ may rest upon me … for when I am weak, then am I strong.”

     Jacob’s human frame ever afterwards showed evidence of his weakness and the need to distrust the flesh, but it would ever be associated with a gracious blessing, a princely name and a consciousness that henceforth his strength was to be found in God.  Jacob’s experience anticipates that day soon to dawn, when the night shall have passed away for ever, when his descendants shall look upon Him whom they pierced (Peniel) and shall say:--

     “Unto Him that loved us and loosed us from our sins by His own blood, and hath made us KINGS and priests unto God” (Rev. i. 5, 6).

      Who is this One upon whom they look?  “PRINCE of the KINGS of the earth.”  Sar of Sars, the  true and antitypical Israel, Prince of God.  Saviour and saved are both foreshadowed.  He the great  King-Priest after the Order of Melchisedek, they the kingdom of priests, a royal priesthood.  Israel like Jacob could not attain this by creature strength, it was when the hollow of his thigh was touched that he asked a blessing and received his princely name.

No comments:

Post a Comment