Thursday, January 15, 2015

#68. The atonement money (Exod. xxx. 11-16).

     The institution of the half shekel of silver as atonement money in this passage is associated with numbering the children of Israel and with the possibility of plague.  At first sight there is no apparent connection between these items, but a consciousness that all Scripture is inspired and profitable is a great help forward in its understanding.  The association of these features evidently meant something to Moses and Israel, and it will to us as we allow the Word to enter and give us light.

     “When thou takest the sum of the children of Israel after their number, then shall they give every man a ransom for his soul unto the Lord, when thou numberest them;  that there be no plague among them, when thou numberest.  This shall they give, every one that passeth among them that are numbered, half a shekel, after the shekel of the sanctuary (a shekel is twenty gerahs):  an half shekel shall be the offering of the Lord” (Exod.xxx.12,13).
  
     What is the association between numbering, plague and the ransom of half a shekel?  And why are we told just here that the shekel is equal to twenty gerahs?  It is evident that each person paid ten gerahs, and if we took our stand with this people we should not be long before we saw some association between the ten gerahs and the ten plagues that fell upon Egypt, from which Israel were spared and delivered by redeeming blood.  This is no play of imagination, as a reference to  Exodus xiii.  will show.  There we find that by reason of the fact that Israel were spared, while the tenth plague were enjoined to wear the phylacteries as “a sign and a memorial”, and to sanctify every firstborn, whether of man or beast, unto the Lord.

     “The males shall be the Lord’s.  And every firstling of an ass thou shalt redeem with a lamb . . . . . and all the firstborn of man among thy children shalt thou redeem . . . . . when Pharaoh would not let us go, the Lord  slew all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man, and the firstborn of beast:  therefore I sacrifice to the Lord all that openeth the matrix, being males;  but all the firstborn of my sons I redeem” (Exod.xiii.12-15).

     Later on another phase of substitution was introduced whereby the whole tribe of Levi was set apart instead of every firstborn of the whole nation.

     “And I, behold, I have taken the Levites from among the sons of Israel instead of all the firstborn … because all the firstborn are Mine:  for on the day that I smote all the firstborn in the land of Egypt I hallowed unto Me all the firstborn of Israel, both man and beast:  Mine shall they be:  I am the Lord” (Numb.iii.12,13).

     Then comes the numbering of the Levites in verses 14-39, and the numbering of the firstborn of Israel in verses 40-43.  It so transpired that there were 22,273 firstborn males of Israel and 22,000 Levites of one month old and upward, leaving 273 to be specially redeemed by the payment of five shekels apiece.  This sum of 1,365 shekels was given to Aaron and his sons (Numbers.iii.45-51).

     There is evidently some similar principle at work in  Exodus xxx.   In this case the numbering is of all who are twenty years old and upward, and the ransom money is appointed for the service of the tabernacle as a memorial (xxx. 16).  The number of those who thus paid their half shekel was 603,550 men, and of the total sum 100 talents were used to make the sockets of silver on which the tabernacle rested, while some, at least, of the remainder were used in the making of the silver hooks, chapiters and fillets that were specified.

     No distinction was made between rich and poor in the matter of this atonement money:  “The rich shall not give more, and the poor shall not give less” (Exod. xxx. 15).  Whilst we have a recognition of “each one’s several ability” in the distribution of the talents, one receiving five, another two, and another only one, whilst reward for service will be in some measure proportionate to faithfulness, yet, when we deal with such matters as redemption and atonement, “there is no difference”, all alike are redeemed by the blood of the Lamb, all alike pay their half shekel, neither more nor less.

     It is a blessed thought, that every time an Israelite looked at his own firstborn son, he had a “memorial” of substitution before him.  Every time he looked at a Levite accomplishing the service of God, every firstborn male could say:  There is one who hath taken my place.  Every time he considered the foundations upon which the tabernacle rested, they spoke of his atonement.

     What of the spiritual realities of which these are but shadows?  Does our conception of service, worship and the present position of Christ at the right hand of God bring vividly to our mind and heart the consciousness that we are not our own;  that we are bought with a price?

     There is one occasion in the history of David, in which “numbering”, “plague” and “ransom” figure, that should be considered as a contrast to this ordinance.  David was moved to number Israel and Judah.  Even Joab realized that the spirit that prompted this numbering was not good (II Sam. xxiv. 3), and David subsequently confessed that he had sinned greatly (verse 10).  The result was judgment, in the form either of famine, defeat, or pestilence, and the sequel was the erection of an altar and the offering of sacrifice.  The words of  Exod.xxx.12  come to mind as one reads this tragic chapter:--

     “Then shall he give every man a ransom for his soul unto the Lord, when thou numberest them;  that there be no plague among them, when thou numberest them.”

     The numbering of Israel by David was evidently done either in pride, or in unbelief of the power of God.  The grace of God that chose Israel for His own ignored their numerical inferiority as compared with other nations (Deut. vii. 7, 8).  While Israel remained true, “one should chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight” (Deut. xxxii. 30), but when they were unfaithful “a small company of men” was sufficient to conquer “a very great host”, for the Lord would not be with them.

     The solemn numbering of Israel with the accompanying emphasis upon atonement would impress upon them the truth concerning both their own shortcomings and the Lord’s grace.

     The depths of love were sounded when the spotless Son of God was “numbered with the transgressors”.  Whenever we think of that, the only numbering that matters to us is that we have been numbered with His saints, and rejoice in the hope of the glory of God.

No comments:

Post a Comment