Wednesday, November 19, 2014

#26. Gaps in the Calendar of Faith (Gen. xii. 10-20).

     We noticed in our last article the fundamental lesson of separation as it is exhibited in the case of Lot and Abram;   we are now to see Abram in yet another light, and most heart-searching lesson awaits us. 

     “And there was a famine in the land:  and Abram went down to Egypt to sojourn there, for the famine was grievous in the land.”

     One of the lessons that we all have to learn is expressed in the words of  Deuteronomy viii.:--

     “Thou shalt remember all the way which the Lord thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, and to prove thee, to know what was in thine heart, whether thou wouldest keep His commandments or no, and He humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know, that He might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord doth man live.  Thy raiment waxed not old upon thee, neither did thy foot swell, these forty years;  thou shalt also consider in thine heart, that, as a man chasteneth his son, so the Lord chasteneth thee.”

     Perhaps the strongest test of the faith indicated in these occurrences is the character of the manna, “which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know”;  faith trusts apart from sight or knowledge, but sense yearns for something substantial, not realizing that “faith is the substance of things hoped for”.  We must not judge by some rule of thumb, for each case has its own peculiar position in the purpose of God.  When on another occasion a famine swept over Canaan, and the sons of Jacob went down to Egypt, we can see that it was part of a Divine plan to bring about God’s own purpose;  and again, when Herod sought to kill the infant Christ, Joseph and Mary found refuge in Egypt at the command of an angel of God.  Whether, therefore, Abram should have remained in Canaan in spite of the famine, or whether he was right to go to Egypt, it is not for us to say, one thing comes prominently out of the story, and that is the terrible effect upon the pilgrim of faith a close proximity to the world can have. 

     “And it came to pass when he was come near to enter Egypt, that he said unto Sarai his wife, Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to look upon;  therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive.  Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister;  that it may be well with me for thy sake, and my soul shall live because of thee.”

     Bishop Hall’s pithy comment is worth repeating:--

     “God hath said, I will make thee a great nation:  Abram saith, the Egyptians will kill me … he through inconsiderateness doubted twice of his life doubted not the life of his seed … yet it was more difficult that his posterity should live in Sarah, than that Sarah’s husband should live in Egypt.”

     When we analyze unbelief, it is of all things most unreasonable.  Abram would doubtless have defended his attitude by saying that after all Sarai was his sister.  The poet has it that the lie which is half the truth is ever the blackest of lies, and it is more abominable in Abram to make the semblance of truth his refuge, than for the wicked to lie outright.  The world, the Pharaohs of this spiritual Egypt, they will even reprove the man of faith for his inconsistency.  The famine in Canaan was a trial certainly, but all trials that come upon the child of God are intended to lead him more continually to Christ.  If Abram had only thought what he was doing, as he drew near to Egypt, he would have realized that to take refuge in a lie was to depart from God.  True, Abram exchanged Canaan’s famine for plenty — “he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels” — but he had no fellowship with God.  This we shall see in the sequel. 

     The plagues sent by the Lord because of Abram’s wife are sent to unmask Abram’s deceit.  An unbeliever (or at least a type of this world), rebukes the man of God:--

     “And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me?  Why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife?  Why saidst thou, she is my sister?  So I might have taken her to me;  now therefore, behold thy wife, take her and go thy way.”

     Let us notice how Abram’s sin involved others.  “What is this that thou hast done unto me?”  The pilgrim cannot step aside from the path of faith without evil resulting to himself and others.  How sad to think that he who had been specially called out to be a blessing to all nations, should by his first individual act involve (but for the mercy of God) a nation in sin! 

     Chapter xiii.  sees Abram leaving Egypt rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold, yet poor as yet in the treasures of faith:--

     “And he went on his journey from the south, even to Bethel, unto the place where his tent had been at the beginning, between Bethel and Hai, unto the place of the altar which he had made there at the first, and there Abram called on the name of the Lord” (Gen. xiii. 3, 4).

     This is a picture of restoration, “He restoreth my soul, He leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for His name’s sake”.  The time which Abram spent in Egypt was so much waste, so far as God was concerned;  he had to retrace his steps to the starting point.  Similarly, Jonah ran away from the Lord, and entered a ship bound for Tarshish, yet when the great fish vomited up Jonah, he was upon the coast of the country he had been told to visit (Jonah iii. 1):--

     “And the word of the Lord came unto Jonah the second time, saying, Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and preach unto it the preaching that I bid thee.”

     Not only is it true that these lapses in the path of faith are so much lost time to the individual believer, but it enters also into the great prophetical reckonings of God with His people.  We doubtless are aware that there are what are called lo-ammi periods in biblical chronology;  lo-ammi being the  Hebrew for, “not my people”.  According to  I Kings vi. 1  the temple was commenced in the 480th year after the children of Israel had departed  from  Egypt,  whereas  according to  Acts xiii. 17-22  the period  is given as 573 years (this includes 3 years of Solomon’s reign), a difference of  93 years.  Abram’s loss of communion, and the re-commencement with God from where he was at the beginning, is but a small example of the principle that solves this apparent riddle. 

     During the time of the Judges Israel were taken away captive 5 times, and if we note the duration of these captivities, we find they total exactly 93 years!  In case some readers are acquainted with this fact, we give the references hereunder:--

Chusan-rishathaim.                       Judges iii. 8.                  8  years. 
Eglon                                                         iii. 14.              18
Jabin                                                          iv. 2.                20
Midian                                                        vi. 1.                 7
Philistines                                                  xiii. 1   .           40
                                                                                        ------
                                                                                Total  93  years.  
                                                                                        ====

     The years of the Acts reckoning are Anno Mundi (in the year of the world), whereas the 480th year of  I Kings  is Anno Dei (in God’s year), showing that no record is made of the years of captivity.  What a short term of Christian service some of us really serve when we come to consider the many lapses, and the many fresh beginnings that we can remember.  What a mercy that the Lord does restore us, yet should we remember His words, “Go, and sin no more”.  The reader who is interested in the prophetic times of  Daniel ix.  will find a further application of this principle in  volume VI  The Berean Expositor  (page 165). 

     We are sure that when Abram reached the place of tent and altar, and there called upon the name of the Lord, he realized that nothing Egypt could offer was so precious as these two accompaniments of his pilgrimage.  The world throughout all dispensations has been an unqualified snare:  the wise will profit by these scriptural examples, while the foolish will think that where Abram failed, they will succeed.  Doubtless Lot thought he would overcome the evil of Sodom, but we know that he did not. 

     We cannot close without at least a remembrance of that One who though the Son of God (and who could, had He wished, have turned the stones of the wilderness into bread), nevertheless waited upon God, repelling the suggestion of dependence upon any arm save that of His Father.  Abram will find his place in the list of those who lived by faith, but the One who eclipses the whole cloud of witnesses is that One who is the author and perfecter of faith. 

     “Seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.”

No comments:

Post a Comment